Jessica J. F. Kram, MPH; Yuri Zermeno, MD; James O. Adefisoye, MS; Elizabeth Dickson Michelson, MD; Emily Malloy, PhD, CNM; Nicole Salvo, MD
WMJ. 2024;123(6):483-486.
ABSTRACT
Background: Accurate measurement of blood loss during delivery is important for early hemorrhage detection.
Methods: We compared quantitative blood loss and estimated blood loss to calculated blood loss. We reviewed cesarean deliveries for estimated blood loss and quantitative blood loss, December 1, 2018, to December 1, 2019. A standard formula was used for calculated blood loss.
Results: Overall (n = 483), median values (m; interquartile range [IQR]) for estimated blood loss (600.0 mL; IQR 500.0–800.0) and quantitative blood loss (557.0 mL; IQR 350.0 – 824.0) were significantly lower (both P values < 0.001) than calculated blood loss (929.4 mL; IQR 551.5 – 1351.5). Compared to calculated blood loss, both estimated blood loss and quantitative blood loss had low sensitivity, high specificity, and low negative predictive values. Only 10 additional patients were identified as having a postpartum hemorrhage through quantitative blood loss.
Discussion: Quantitative blood loss and estimated blood loss are immediately available in clinical practice, while calculated blood loss is not and requires additional time to obtain. All methods currently available have shortcomings. Continued efforts to create a reliable tool for identifying blood loss are needed.