Chidinma O. Ikonte, BS; Mohamed T. Abdelrahim, MD, MA; Akorfa Adobor, BS; Philisha Mesidor, MS; Nhung H. Tran, BS; Sanjay Bhandari, MD; Pinky Jha, MD
WMJ. 2026;125(1):79-82.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bedside rounding remains a cornerstone of medical education and patient care, yet there are concerns about its efficiency and feasibility. This study explored hospitalists’ perspectives on rounding methods and strategies to balance education with effective patient care.
Methods: Academic hospitalists at a Midwest academic medical center completed a survey assessing preferred rounding methods and perceived benefits and barriers.
Results: Of 36 respondents, 33% preferred table rounds followed by bedside rounds, 24% favored bedside rounds, and 21% chose table rounds. Reported benefits of bedside rounds included improved communication, empathy, and shared decision-making. Common barriers included duty-hour restrictions (89%) and scheduled educational activities (86%).
Conclusions: Hospitalists value bedside rounding for its educational and patient-centered benefits but also reported several barriers. Findings highlight the need for innovation in rounding methods to overcome these challenges.